Annotated Sources
Alper, Bianca Finley, Isaac Fellman, and Megan Needels. “The Uncontrolled Vocabulary: Queer Archiving and the Fluidity of Language.” Descriptive Notes: The blog of the Description Section of the Society of American Archivists, December 5, 2022. https://saadescription.wordpress.com/2022/12/05/the-uncontrolled-vocabulary-queer-archiving-and-the-fluidity-of-language/.
Alper, Fellman, and Needels document their work at the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender (GLBT) Historical Society to reconsider the limited and anachronistic language of the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). For granular metadata terms, they rely on style guides from queer and Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color (BIPOC) groups. To facilitate interoperability with other catalogs, they use Homosaurus and LCSH terms for generic subject headings. These terms did not override older ones used by members of the queer community; those terms were used within the description and notes, so they could be adequately contextualized for users. The authors emphasize that any changes to controlled vocabularies must keep in mind the ethics of their choices if they are to work against the restrictive precedents and systemic processes of any institution and collection. Likewise, they must remain fluid, adapting to emerging changes in definition within the communities they represent.
Kumbier, Alana, and Julia Starkey. “Access Is Not Problem Solving: Disability Justice and Libraries.” Library Trends 64, no. 3 (2016): 468–491. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/613919.
Kumbier and Starkey explore how the discourse of accessibility in libraries benefits from being put in conversation with disability scholars’ and activists’ work on access. More specifically, they ask that administrators, librarians, and library workers consider disability as more than ADA compliance and a problem to be solved. Rather, library staff should recognize that disability is a fluid and socially constructed experience—one shaped by social, cultural, political, economic, and historic factors—as well as an individual and specific experience that necessitates material accommodations. Library staff must consider both the material and systemic issues of access. Kumbier and Starkey suggest community-informed approaches to determining and addressing issues of access; increased recruitment, education, and support of persons with disabilities by information science graduate programs and libraries; publication of the perspectives of persons with disabilities and disability scholars within library and information science journals; and intersectional understandings of access and accessibility.
Luke, Stephanie M., Sara Pezzoni, and Whitney Russell. “Towards More Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Representation in Metadata and Digitization: A Case Study.” The Serials Librarian 82, nos. 1-4 (2022): 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2022.2040241.
Luke, Pezzonoi, and Russell detail their experience at the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) Libraries to revise digitization and metadata workflows to provide access to underrepresented voices within their collections in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement. As part of this work, the authors worked on a committee to address issues surrounding digitization, metadata, and access, including suggesting goals for future work to increase diversity, equity, and access in UTA’s holdings. To do so, the committee identified and prioritized marginalized representations in their holdings for digitization, suggested gaps to be addressed by future acquisitions, defined harmful language in the libraries’ digital collections and catalog and reviewed other institutions’ approaches as references for how to correct language, and created a framework and procedure for reviewing content and language used in research guides and finding aids annually.
O’Neal. Jennifer R. “‘The Right to Know’: Decolonizing Native American Archives.” Journal of Western Archives 6, no. 1 (2015): Article 2. https://doi.org/10.26077/fc99-b022.
O’Neal details efforts to decolonize collections and archives, particularly in the American West. Following Vine Deloria’s “The Right to Know” (1978) as an evaluative framework, she surveys reparative work done to decolonize archives and reconnect Native American communities to their documents, working against archival exclusion, both physically and materially. She also documents efforts to develop Native American archives by and for the community as well as advocacy for the training of Native American librarians and archivists. O’Neal advocates for the inclusion of Native Americans in processing and maintaining their communities’ records and for recognition of the limitations of Western archival theoretical frameworks for Native American collections. She also suggests combining archival theory and processing with the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). O’Neal underscores the necessity of access, collaboration, healing, reconciliation, and restoration for decolonization to succeed.
Powell, Chaitra, Holly Smith, Shanee’ Murrain, and Shyla Hearn. “This [Black] Woman’s Work: Exploring Archival Projects that Embrace the Identity of the Memory Worker.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 2, no. 1 (2018): Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.25.
Powell, Smith, Murrain, and Hearn look through their experiences as Black women archivists in distinct organizations to uncover ways that archives, institutions, and the archival profession can support and sustain Black community archives. They approach this exploration in four sections: advocacy, collaboration, truth, and agency. Each reflects a central approach in each respective author’s experience with Black archives. Each finds ways of connecting the Black community to the archive, involving voices typically erased from or excluded from participating in shaping collection procedures or exhibition curation, for example. This work can be reparative and restorative, though as the authors acknowledge, the work is ongoing. What is required is organizations reassessing and adjusting themselves to partner with Black communities and intentionally re-invest in community relationships fiscally, procedurally, and ideologically.
Additional Resources
Aase, Lara. “There Is No View From Nowhere: User Experience Research at the Center of Southwest Studies Library.” Collection Management, Sharing Knowledge and Smashing Stereotypes: Representing Native American, First Nation, and Indigenous Realities in Library Collections, 42, no. 3–4 (October 2, 2017): 139–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2017.1328324.
Acevedo, Oriana, and Ellen Forsyth. “What If I Speak Another Language? Many Libraries, Many Languages.” Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association 70, no. 1 (January 2, 2021): 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2021.1875560.
Adler, Melissa. Cruising the Library: Perversities in the Organization of Knowledge. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017. https://www.worldcat.org/title/1136550407.
———. “Transcending Library Catalogs: A Comparative Study of Controlled Terms in Library of Congress Subject Headings and User-Generated Tags in LibraryThing for Transgender Books.” Journal of Web Librarianship 3, no. 4 (November 23, 2009): 309–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322900903341099.
Alex Brown (they/them) [@QueenOfRats]. “There Absolutely Is a Difference. We Serve Individuals but Pretend They Are the Community.” Tweet. Twitter, August 18, 2021. https://twitter.com/QueenOfRats/status/1427985206976253956.
Alper, Bianca Finley, Isaac Fellman, and Megan Needels. “The Uncontrolled Vocabulary: Queer Archiving and the Fluidity of Language.” Descriptive Notes (blog), December 5, 2022. https://saadescription.wordpress.com/2022/12/05/the-uncontrolled-vocabulary-queer-archiving-and-the-fluidity-of-language/.
Baildon, Michelle. “Extending the Social Justice Mindset: Implications for Scholarly Communication.” College & Research Libraries News 79, no. 4 (2018): 176–79. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.4.176.
Berry, Dorothy. “Digitizing and Enhancing Description Across Collections to Make African American Materials More Discoverable on Umbra Search African American History / Dorothy Berry – The Design for Diversity Learning Toolkit.” The Design for Diversity Learning Toolkit (blog), August 2, 2018. https://des4div.library.northeastern.edu/digitizing-and-enhancing-description-across-collections-to-make-african-american-materials-more-discoverable-on-umbra-search-african-american-history/.
———. “Umbra Search African American History: Aggregating African American Digital Archives.” Items (blog), December 14, 2016. https://items.ssrc.org/parameters/umbra-search-african-american-history-aggregating-african-american-digital-archives/.
Big Ten Academic Alliance Libraries. “Library Accessibility: Toolkit and Standardized License Language from the BTAA.” Accessed May 17, 2023. https://btaa.org/library/reports.
Billey, Amber, Emily Drabinski, and K. R. Roberto. “What’s Gender Got to Do with It? A Critique of RDA 9.7.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 52, no. 4 (May 19, 2014): 412–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.882465.
Brilmyer, Gracen. “‘They Weren’t Necessarily Designed with Lived Experiences of Disability in Mind’: The Affect of Archival In/Accessibility and ‘Emotionally Expensive’ Spatial Un/Belonging.” Archivaria, no. 94 (December 14, 2022): 120–53. https://doi.org/10.7202/1094878ar.
Bryant, Melissa. “Whāia te Mātauranga – How are Research Libraries in Aotearoa New Zealand Applying Ngā Ūpoko Tukutuku / the Māori Subject Headings and Offering Them to Users?” Masters Thesis, School of Information Management, Te Herenga Waka – Victoria University of Wellington, 2015. https://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10063/4633/thesis.pdf?sequence=2.
Carey, Frederick. “Communicating with Information: Creating Inclusive Learning Environments for Students with ASD.” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, April 1, 2020. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2020/communicating-with-information/.
Caswell, Michelle. “‘Thank You Very Much, Now Give Them Back’: Cultural Property and the Fight over the Iraqi Baath Party Records.” Edited by Mary Pugh. The American Archivist 74, no. 1 (Spring/Summer 2011): 211–40. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4185u8574mu84041.
Chen, Gen-Fang. “Intangible Cultural Heritage Preservation: An Exploratory Study of Digitization of the Historical Literature of Chinese Kunqu Opera Librettos.” Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 7, no. 1 (2014).
Chetty, Pria, Eve Gray, Cynthia Jimes, Ph.D., Bob Jolliffe, Julian Jonker, Rebecca Kahn, Kerryn McKay, et al. “Access to Knowledge in South Africa.” Part of the Access to Knowledge Research Series. Cape Town, South Africa; New Haven, CT: The Intellectual Property Law Research Unit, University of Cape Town, in collaboration with the Information Society Project at Yale Law School, 2009. https://edulibpretoria.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/access-to-knowledge-in-sa.pdf.
Chiricuzio, Sossity. “‘An Ethical Imperative’: Expanding Accessibility in Libraries at NC State.” Library Journal, February 9, 2023. https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/an-ethical-imperative-expanding-accessibility-in-libraries-at-nc-state.
Christen, Kimberly. “Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation.” Edited by Mary Pugh. The American Archivist 74, no. 1 (April 2011): 185–210. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521.
———. “Tribal Archives, Traditional Knowledge, and Local Contexts: Why the ‘s’ Matters.” Journal of Western Archives 6, no. 1 (January 7, 2015). https://doi.org/10.26077/78d5-47cf.
“D&I Planning Spotlight: University Library | UChicago Diversity Initiative | The University of Chicago.” Accessed September 3, 2020. https://diversityandinclusion.uchicago.edu/news/article/di-planning-spotlight-university-library/.
Drake, Jarrett M. “Liberatory Archives: Towards Belonging and Believing (Part 1).” On Archivy (blog), October 22, 2016. https://medium.com/on-archivy/liberatory-archives-towards-belonging-and-believing-part-1-d26aaeb0edd1.
Dunham, Elizabeth, and Xaviera Flores. “Breaking the Language Barrier: Describing Chicano Archives with Bilingual Finding Aids.” The American Archivist 77, no. 2 (Fall/Winter 2014): 499–509. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.77.2.p66l555g15g981p6.
Google Docs. “Value Into Action: Evaluating & Developing Monographic Collectionsfor Diversity & Inclusion.” Accessed September 3, 2020. https://drive.google.com/file/d/11034kec_tsk-ydOvkZG4XzECvKkD6mr4/view?usp=embed_facebook.
Harris, Verne. “The Archival Sliver: Power, Memory, and Archives in South Africa.” Archival Science 2, no. 1–2 (March 2002): 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435631.
Hennessy, Kate. “Virtual Repatriation and Digital Cultural Heritage: The Ethics of Managing Online Collections.” Anthropology News 50, no. 4 (2009): 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-3502.2009.50405.x.
Henninger. “Multilingualism, Neoliberalism, and Language Ideologies in Libraries.” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, April 29, 2020. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2020/multilingualism-in-libraries/.
Henry, Tiffany, Rhonda Kauffman, and Anastasia Chiu. “The Old and the Prudish: An Examination of Sex, Sexuality, and Queerness in Library of Congress Classification.” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, June 1, 2022. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2022/the-old-and-the-prudish/.
Herrera, Gail. “Undergraduate Library Collection Use and Diversity: Testing for Racial and Gender Differences.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 16, no. 4 (October 6, 2016): 763–74. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2016.0051.
Hodges, Dracine. “Pursuing Diversity and Inclusion in Technical Services.” Serials Review 44, no. 3 (July 3, 2018): 170–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2018.1549888.
Honma, Todd. “Trippin’ Over the Color Line: The Invisibility of Race in Library and Information Studies.” InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies 1, no. 2 (June 21, 2005). https://doi.org/10.5070/D412000540.
Ihekwoaba, Emmanuel Chukwudi, Roseline Ngozi Okwor, and Ogechukwu Olivia Uzowulu. “Access Provision for Students with Reading Disabilities (SRDs) in Nigerian University Libraries.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 35 (September 2022): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102622.
“IUPUI Diversity Statement (Not Just Collections),” n.d. https://ulib.iupui.edu/about/policies/diversity-statement.
Johnson, Matt. “Transgender Subject Access: History and Current Practice.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 48, no. 8 (September 27, 2010): 661–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903534398.
Kublik, Angela, Virginia Clevette, Dennis Ward, and Hope A. Olson. “Adapting Dominant Classifications to Particular Contexts.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 37, no. 1–2 (July 2003): 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v37n01_03.
Kumbier, Alana, and Julia Starkey. “Access Is Not Problem Solving: Disability Justice and Libraries.” Library Trends 64, no. 3 (2016): 468–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2016.0004.
Lee, Deborah. “Indigenous Knowledge Organization: A Study of Concepts, Terminology, Structure and (Mostly) Indigenous Voices.” Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 6, no. 1 (July 3, 2011): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v6i1.1427.
Liew, Chern L. “Cross-Cultural Design and Usability of a Digital Library Supporting Access to Maori Cultural Heritage Resources.” In Design and Usability of Digital Libraries: Case Studies in the Asia Pacific, 285–97. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing, 2005.
López, Sol María, and Laura Wright. “Using Alternative Subject Headings Locally to Promote Inclusiveness and Diversity.” October 16, 2018. https://www.librarieslearn.org/wp-content/uploads/Radical-Cataloging.pdf.
Luke, Stephanie M., Sara Pezzoni, and Whitney Russell. “Towards More Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Representation in Metadata and Digitization: A Case Study.” The Serials Librarian 82, no. 1–4 (May 1, 2022): 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2022.2040241.
Magnus, Ebony, Jackie Belanger, and Maggie Faber. “Towards a Critical Assessment Practice.” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, October 31, 2018. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2018/towards-critical-assessment-practice/.
Marsh, Diana E., Ricardo L. Punzalan, Robert Leopold, Brian Butler, and Massimo Petrozzi. “Stories of Impact: The Role of Narrative in Understanding the Value and Impact of Digital Collections.” Archival Science 16, no. 4 (December 2016): 327–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9253-5.
Mathé, Barbara. “Whose Pictures Are These? Indigenous Community Access and Control of Digital Archives.” Girona 2014 Archives and Cultural Industries Conference, 2014. http://www.girona.cat/web/ica2014/ponents/textos/id240.pdf.
McCrea, Donna. “Creating a More Accessible Environment for Our Users with Disabilities: Responding to an Office for Civil Rights Complaint.” Archival Issues 38, no. 1 (January 1, 2017): 7–18. https://doi.org/10.31274/archivalissues.11029.
Olson, Hope A. The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. https://www.worldcat.org/title/50404371.
———. “The Power to Name: Representation in Library Catalogs.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 26, no. 3 (April 2001): 639–68. https://doi.org/10.1086/495624.
Olson, Hope A., and Rose Schlegl. “Standardization, Objectivity, and User Focus: A Meta-Analysis of Subject Access Critiques.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 32, no. 2 (September 1, 2001): 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v32n02_06.
O’Neal, Jennifer R. “‘The Right to Know’: Decolonizing Native American Archives.” The Right to Know, Native American Archives Special Issue, 6, no. 1 (2015): 1–17.
Oppenneer, mark. “A Value Sensitive Design Approach to Indigenous Knowledge Management Systems.” The Ethnos Project, October 19, 2009. https://www.ethnosproject.org/a-value-sensitive-design-approach-to-indigenous-knowledge-management-systems/.
Ostergaard, Kirsten. “Accessibility from Scratch: One Library’s Journey to Prioritize the Accessibility of Electronic Information Resources.” The Serials Librarian 69, no. 2 (August 18, 2015): 155–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1069777.
Park, Jung-ran. “Cross-Lingual Name and Subject Access: Mechanisms and Challenges.” Library Resources & Technical Services 51, no. 3 (2007): 180–89.
Pellack, Lorraine J., and Lori Osmus Kappmeyer. “The Ripple Effect of Women’s Name Changes in Indexing, Citation, and Authority Control.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62, no. 3 (2011): 440–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21469.
Pigliasco, Guido Carlo. “Intangible Cultural Property, Tangible Databases, Visible Debates: The Sawau Project.” International Journal of Cultural Property 16, no. 3 (August 2009): 255–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739109990233.
Pionke, JJ. “Toward Holistic Accessibility: Narratives from Functionally Diverse Patrons.” Reference & User Services Quarterly 57, no. 1 (2017): 48–56.
Powell, Chaitra, Holly Smith, Shanee’ Murrain, and Skyla Hearn. “This [Black] Woman’s Work: Exploring Archival Projects That Embrace the Identity of the Memory Worker.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 2 (November 29, 2018): 5–5. https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.25.
Raju, Reggie, Jill Claassen, Jeremiah Pietersen, and Danielle Abrahamse. “An Authentic Flip Subscription Model for Africa: Library as Publisher Service.” Library Management 41, no. 6/7 (August 10, 2020): 369–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-03-2020-0054.
Rawson, K. J. “Accessing Transgender // Desiring Queer(Er?) Archival Logics.” Archivaria, 2009, 123–40.
Reidsma, Matthew. “Algorithmic Bias in Library Discovery Systems.” Matthew Reidsma (blog), March 11, 2016.
Rinn, Meghan R. “Nineteenth-Century Depictions of Disabilities and Modern Metadata: A Consideration of Material in the P. T. Barnum Digital Collection.” Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies 5, no. Article 1 (2018). https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol5/iss1/1?utm_source=elischolar.library.yale.edu%2Fjcas%2Fvol5%2Fiss1%2F1&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.
Roberson, Casey Alexander, Trisha Barefield, and Eric Griffith. “Students with Disabilities and Library Services: Blending Accommodation and Universal Design.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 48, no. 4 (July 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102531.
Roth, Amanda, and Dominique Turnbow. “Equitable but Not Diverse: Universal Design for Learning Is Not Enough.” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, May 26, 2021. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2021/equitable-but-not-diverse/.
Stanco, Filippo, Sebastiano Battiato, and Giovanni Gallo. Digital Imaging for Cultural Heritage Preservation: Analysis, Restoration, and Reconstruction of Ancient Artworks. Digital Imaging and Computer Vision Series. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2011.
Stephan, Weatherly A. “The Platinum Rule Meets the Golden Minimum: Inclusive and Efficient Archival Description of Oral Histotries.” The Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies 8 (2021): 1–16.
Swanson, Raegan. “Adapting the Brian Deer Classification System for Aanischaaukamikw Cree Cultural Institute.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Indigenous Knowledge Organization, 53, no. 5–6 (2015): 568–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1009669.
Tam, Marcella. “Improving Access and ‘Unhiding’ the Special Collections.” The Serials Librarian 73, no. 2 (August 18, 2017): 179–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2017.1329178.
Tang, Annie, Dorothy Berry, Kelly Bolding, and Rachel E Winston. “Toward Culturally Competent Archival (Re)Description of Marginalized Histories,” Vol. 2018. Washington, D.C., 2018. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=library_presentations.
Thompson, Kim M., and Anindita Paul. “‘I Am Not Sure How Much It Will Be Helpful for Me’: Factors for Digital Inclusion among Middle-Class Women in India.” The Library Quarterly 86, no. 1 (January 2016): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1086/684144.
Thorpe, Kirsten, and Monica Galassi. “Diversity, Inclusion & Respect: Embedding Indigenous Priorities in Public Library Services.” Public Library Quarterly 37, no. 2 (2018): 180–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1460568.
Tropea, Rachel, and Georgina Ward. “Fierce Compassion and Reflexivity: Transforming Practice at the University of Melbourne Archives.” Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 3, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v3i2.121.
Turner, Jennifer, and Jessica Schomberg. “Inclusivity, Gestalt Principles, and Plain Language in Document Design.” In the Library with the Lead Pipe, June 29, 2016. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2016/accessibility/.
Watson, Brian M. “Advancing Equitable Cataloging.” NASKO, Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, 8, no. 1 (2021): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.7152/nasko.v8i1.15887.
Watson, Brian M., Chloe Noland, and Amber Billey. “The Homosaurus.” Catalogue and Index, no. 202 (March 2021): 44–47.
Whaanga, Hēmi, David Bainbridge, Michela Anderson, Korii Scrivener, Papitha Cader, Tom Roa, and Te Taka Keegan. “He Matapihi Mā Mua, Mō Muri: The Ethics, Processes, and Procedures Associated with the Digitization of Indigenous Knowledge—The Pei Jones Collection.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Indigenous Knowledge Organization, 53, no. 5–6 (July 4, 2015): 520–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1009670.
White, Sara. “Crippling the Archives: Negotiating Notions of Disability in Appraisal and Arrangement and Description.” The American Archivist 75, no. 1 (April 2012): 109–24. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.75.1.c53h4712017n4728.
Wicker, Marci. “Invisible Disability and Inclusivity in Libraries.” Information Today, August 2022.
Wijoyono, Elanto, and Adriani Dwi Kartika. “Indonesian Heritage Inventory: Open Source Initiative for Endangered Heritage Monitoring.” In 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage), 121–121. Marseille, France: IEEE, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6744743.
Yoon, Kyunghye, Laura Hulscher, and Rachel Dols. “Accessibility and Diversity in Library and Information Science: Inclusive Information Architecture for Library Websites.” The Library Quarterly 86, no. 2 (April 2016): 213–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/685399.
Zorich, Diane. A Survey of Digital Cultural Heritage Initiatives and Their Sustainability Concerns. Washington, D.C: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2003.